From Half-Truths to Situated Truths: Exploring Situatedness in Human-AI Collaborative Decision-Making in the Medical Context

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published Nov 8, 2024
Bijona Troqe Nicolette Lakemond Gunnar Holmberg

Abstract

While the introduction of artificial intelligence (AI) solutions has large potential to improve organizational decision-making, it requires a further understanding of how humans and AI can collaborate. Through the lens of situatedness, this paper attempts to provide insight into the wider nature of human-AI collaborative decision-making. Based on a case study on AI-assisted breast cancer screening, two important findings can be highlighted. First, decomposition and decoupling through temporal division of action with either humans or AI dominating enable an advanced human-AI decision process to be decoupled while enabled by a foundation of shared situatedness. Second, decision-making emerges as a dynamic sensemaking process with each additional human-AI interaction evolving the decision-making process until a final decision outcome is reached.

How to Cite

Troqe, B., Lakemond, N. ., & Holmberg, G. . (2024). From Half-Truths to Situated Truths: Exploring Situatedness in Human-AI Collaborative Decision-Making in the Medical Context. Journal of Competences, Strategy & Management, 12, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.25437/jcsm-vol12-102
Abstract 83 | Article Downloads 59

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

Decision-making, situatedness, organizational context, human-AI collaboration, personalized medicine, breast cancer screening

Section
Research article